On October 3, 2025, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC, 124 F.4th 1053 (7th Cir. 2025), taking on the question of whether federal law preempts state negligent selection claims against brokers. This marks a significant development in the ongoing circuit split over the reach of the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (FAAAA) and its “safety exception.”

The Supreme Court’s review signals that much-needed clarity may soon be available for brokers, carriers, and litigants nationwide. As discussed in our earlier post, the Sixth and Ninth Circuits have allowed negligent selection claims under the safety exception, while the Seventh and Eleventh Circuits have found such claims preempted. The Court will now determine whether state-law negligence claims against brokers are barred by federal law.Continue Reading Supreme Court Puts the Brakes on Preemption Uncertainty

The Surface Transportation Board (STB) recently announced that it is considering issuing a policy statement clarifying the scope of preemption under the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act of 1995 (ICCTA). This development follows a joint letter from multiple rail, intermodal, and other industry associations urging the STB to provide clearer guidance to curb inconsistent state and local regulation affecting rail operations, as well as a series of Policy Review Team meetings with interested parties to discuss ideas for breaking down regulatory barriers and furthering competition. As the STB notes, a “major theme from these meetings was the need for greater clarity and consistency in preemption.”Continue Reading STB Considering Move to Clarify ICCTA Preemption