President Trump’s “Regulatory Freeze Pending Review” Presidential memorandum, which asks agencies to consider postponing the effective date of any rules that have been published in the Federal Register but have not yet taken effect, could impact the new NHTSA final rule related to automatic emergency braking (AEB) technology.

The AEB final rule, published in May 2024, will require all new light vehicles to be equipped with automatic braking systems that meet certain performance requirements by Sept. 1, 2029. The “freeze” does not change this final rule or compliance date.

However, following the “regulatory freeze” memorandum, NHTSA published a notice delaying publication of a November 26, 2024 final rule which responded to automotive industry petitions for reconsideration of the AEB rule, denied many of them, and made some clarifying changes to the standard. The agency will now have until March 20, 2025, to consider the petitions.

This freeze does not have any immediate impact on the forthcoming AEB rule. However, it does indicate that the Trump administration may conduct further review of the rule and to the petitions for reconsideration from vehicle manufacturers and trade associations which, among other things, asked the agency to reconsider the rule’s “no-contact” braking requirement as impractical and inconsistent with global braking standards.

This delay comes on the heels of increasing pushback from the automotive industry against the AEB rule, which includes (in addition to the petitions for reconsideration) a lawsuit filed last week by Alliance for Automotive Innovation that petitioned the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals for additional review of the rule.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Rachael Padgett Rachael Padgett

Rachael Padgett’s practice focuses on the intersection of litigation and regulatory counseling, and she has a passion for advising clients on how to navigate product risk and achieve creative solutions.

As a counsel in the Litigation and Transportation Groups, Rachael handles matters involving…

Rachael Padgett’s practice focuses on the intersection of litigation and regulatory counseling, and she has a passion for advising clients on how to navigate product risk and achieve creative solutions.

As a counsel in the Litigation and Transportation Groups, Rachael handles matters involving product liability litigation, supply chain contract disputes, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and Department of Transportation regulatory counseling, and Consumer Product Safety Commission reporting and investigations. With a focus on the transportation, micromobility, railroad, and retail product industries, she represents clients facing complex, high-stakes problems using a thoughtful, human approach to minimize client exposure and resolve disputes effectively.

Rachael maintains a pro bono practice with a focus on representing children in immigration cases and as guardian ad litem.

During law school, Rachael served as articles editor for The George Washington Law Review and received numerous awards, including the Jacob Burns Award for the First Place Team in the Van Vleck Constitutional Law Moot Court Competition, the Henry R. Berger Award for Excellence in the Area of Tort Law, and the Jennie Hassler Walburn Award for Excellence in the Area of Civil Procedure. She also worked as a judicial intern for the Honorable Michael O’Keefe in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia’s Family Court and regularly volunteered at the Family Court Self-Help Center.

Photo of Rebecca Baden Chaney Rebecca Baden Chaney

Rebecca Baden Chaney is a partner in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office and is co-chair of the firm’s Transportation Practice. Transportation, micromobility, consumer, and other product manufacturers lean on Rebecca Chaney’s keen understanding of the transportation and consumer product industries and the legal…

Rebecca Baden Chaney is a partner in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office and is co-chair of the firm’s Transportation Practice. Transportation, micromobility, consumer, and other product manufacturers lean on Rebecca Chaney’s keen understanding of the transportation and consumer product industries and the legal landscape to advance their businesses. Rebecca applies her commercial-focused product risk lens to represent product manufacturers facing litigation, commercial, and regulatory challenges.

Rebecca is an industry-recognized force in litigating complex product-related warranty, defect, indemnity and contractual commercial disputes, and consumer litigation, including in class actions and mass tort proceedings. She counsels her commercial clients on product disputes, risk mitigation, and crisis management matters. Rebecca additionally defends clients against defamation claims. Clients appreciate Rebecca’s close coordination with them, her proactive approach, and her critical and creative thinking about each stage in a litigation or matter.

Rebecca’s approach embraces product liability risk management across the life cycle of product commercialization, from pre- to post-launch to aftermarket. This includes advice on product labeling, as well as National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and Consumer Product Safety Commission regulatory compliance, recall, and enforcement issues.