On April 21, 2025, the FTC filed an enforcement action against Uber alleging that it enrolled consumers in Uber One without proper consent, created substantial barriers to cancellation, and misrepresented the financial benefits of the subscription. To learn more, please read our Client Alert Three-Clicks You’re Out? The FTC’s Action against Uber Showcases That Businesses Need To Provide Transparent Cancellation Processes.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Joanna Rosen Forster Joanna Rosen Forster

Joanna Forster’s multifaceted background positions her to effectively manage conflicts across the legal spectrum and across the globe. In her prior roles as general counsel (representing both plaintiffs and defendants) and as government prosecutor/enforcer, Joanna handled nearly every type of matter, ranging from

Joanna Forster’s multifaceted background positions her to effectively manage conflicts across the legal spectrum and across the globe. In her prior roles as general counsel (representing both plaintiffs and defendants) and as government prosecutor/enforcer, Joanna handled nearly every type of matter, ranging from complex commercial and white collar matters in areas such as employment, intellectual property, securities and antitrust law, to internal investigations and corporate and M&A transactions. She views her role as both a conflict manager, dispensing advice to avoid adversarial action, and as a tech and business litigator, resolving disputes with her client’s business goals in mind.

Having served as the general counsel and compliance officer of a publicly traded ecommerce platform operating in over 60 countries, Joanna has an appreciation of strategic dispute resolution, investigations, and compliance from a general counsel’s perspective. By understanding how business leaders combine the input of in-house and outside counsel to make decisions, Joanna is able to provide her clients with decisive and efficient legal guidance.

Her practice includes litigating domestic and cross-border complex commercial disputes and advising technology and ecommerce companies on matters related to internet platforms, product launches, market campaigns, and new vertical lines of business, all while advising on foreign and domestic laws that regulate online content, physical products, and the companies that bring them to market. Drawing on her experience as the General Counsel of an online e-commerce marketplace, Joanna also regularly advises and counsels clients on California’s Proposition 65, from prevention and compliance to remediation. Joanna is well-versed in key regulations that impact ecommerce companies, including the EU’s Digital Services Act, the U.S. INFORM Act, and the proposed SHOP SAFE Act, as well as laws and regulations that govern online speech such as the Communications Decency Act, Section 230.

Prior to going in-house, Joanna was the deputy attorney general, Corporate Fraud Section of the California Department of Justice. In this capacity, she led large, complex civil matters alleging violations of California’s False Claims Act, Securities Law, Section 17200, Cartwright Act, and other deceptive business practices. She also maintained her own investigations and litigation docket.

Before joining the California Department of Justice, Joanna spent nearly a decade in private practice, where she focused on civil and criminal antitrust and commercial litigation. She also served as a law clerk for the Honorable Consuelo B. Marshall in the U.S. District Court for the Central District Court of California.

Photo of Shauneida Navarrete Shauneida Navarrete

Shauneida Navarrete’s practice focuses on employment and general commercial litigation disputes in state and federal courts, as well as domestic arbitration forums. In all matters, she partners with clients to help ensure a reasonable resolution for their disputes— whether the resolutions require general

Shauneida Navarrete’s practice focuses on employment and general commercial litigation disputes in state and federal courts, as well as domestic arbitration forums. In all matters, she partners with clients to help ensure a reasonable resolution for their disputes— whether the resolutions require general advice, mediation, or litigation.

Her employment experience includes cases arising out of employment discrimination disputes. Shauneida also advises employers and employees on employment agreements, severance agreements, and general releases.

Within her general commercial litigation practice, she handles disputes ranging from breach of contract to shareholder disputes concerning tender offers. She also has experience with civil RICO claims, Attorney General investigations involving allegations of false advertising and deceptive marketing, SEC and DOJ investigations, indemnification, legal malpractice, legal fee disputes, and election law disputes.

In additional to employment and commercial litigation matters, Shauneida has litigated real estate issues involving breaches of lease agreement and landlord-tenant disputes on behalf of commercial tenants

Photo of Brentnie Brown Brentnie Brown

Brentnie Brown is an associate in the Washington, D.C. office and a member of the Health Care group. Her practice focuses on health care litigation and False Claims Act matters. She also works with the health care regulatory team advising on Stark Law

Brentnie Brown is an associate in the Washington, D.C. office and a member of the Health Care group. Her practice focuses on health care litigation and False Claims Act matters. She also works with the health care regulatory team advising on Stark Law and Anti-Kickback fraud and abuse risks for legal due diligence matters.

Prior to law school, Brentnie was a compliance officer for the City of Dallas, where she reviewed and enforced city ordinances and participated in municipal and district court hearings.

Brentnie received her J.D. from Mitchell Hamline School of Law